Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition

Gerardo OrtegaRadboud University; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Beyza SümerRadboud University; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics,Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Aslı ÖzyürekRadboud University; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics,Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Early studies investigating sign language acquisition claimed that signs whose structures are motivated by the form of their referent (iconic) are not favoured in language development. However, recent work has shown that the first signs in deaf children’s lexicon are iconic. In this paper we go a step further and ask whether different types of iconicity modulate learning sign-referent links. Results from a picture description task indicate that children and adults used signs with two possible variants differentially. While children signing to adults favoured variants that map onto actions associated with a referent (action signs), adults signing to another adult produced variants that map onto objects’ perceptual features (perceptual signs). Parents interacting with children used more action variants than signers in adult-adult interactions. These results are in line with claims that language development is tightly linked to motor experience and that iconicity can be a communicative strategy in parental input.

Files

Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition (0.9 MB)



Back to Table of Contents