Exploring the use of overhypotheses by children and capuchin monkeys
- Elisa Felsche, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
- Patience Stevens, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Christoph Voelter, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
- Daphna Buchsbaum, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Amanda Seed, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
AbstractThe use of abstract higher-level knowledge (overhypotheses) allows humans to learn quickly from sparse data, and make predictions in new situations. Previous research has suggested that humans may be the only species capable of abstract knowledge formation, but this remains controversial, and there is also mixed evidence for when this ability emerges over human development. Kemp et al. (2007) proposed a computational model of overhypothesis formation from sparse data, which has not been directly tested in children or in any non-human species. We developed an ecologically valid paradigm for testing two species, capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and 4-5-year-old human children, and compared it to predictions made by models with and without the capacity to learn overhypotheses. Children’s choices were consistent with the overhypothesis model predictions, whereas monkeys performed at chance level.
Return to previous page